What naming convention is used for changes made to address defects?

The naming convention used for changes made to address defects typically follows a structured format that includes identifying the user associated with the correction and the specific defect being addressed. The choice that includes "user/{user_id}/{DE_id}" aligns with this approach, as it highlights both the user who initiated the change and the specific defect ID (DE_id) related to the defect being resolved. This format ensures clarity and traceability, allowing teams to quickly understand who made the change and which defect it pertains to.

In contrast, other naming conventions serve different purposes. The option that starts with "release/r-{release number}" is used for release management, tracking changes associated with a specific software release rather than individual defect fixes. The "user/{user_id}/{US_id}" format is likely intended for user stories, which outline features or enhancements, not defects. Lastly, "hotfix/identifier" typically refers to urgent patches that address critical issues but lacks specificity related to individual users or defect identifiers. Thus, the chosen option is the most appropriate for defect-related changes.